Showing posts with label tanning beds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tanning beds. Show all posts

With Spring in the Air, New Sun-Safe, UV-Safe Recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics

With spring in the air and the long sunny days of summer not too far off, the American Academy of Pediatrics has released a new policy statement on the hazards of UV radiation exposure in children and adolescents.  The statement, published in the journal Pediatrics (link), refreshes and reinforces what many of us know - that unprotected sun exposure and tanning bed use are unhealthy activities for everyone, but particularly so for youth.    UV radiation exposure raises the risk of skin cancer, including deadly melanoma, rates of which keep climbing higher and higher.

As we've chronicled in a number of previous blog posts (UV, tanning beds), a lot of us fall short when it comes to protecting ourselves against UV exposure.  About a third of people in the US report at least one sunburn a year, with about 20 percent reporting four or more.  The high rates of tanning bed use by teenagers, particularly girls, is particularly concerning, given the high concentration of UV radiation delivered by tanning beds and that the exposure occurs in a time of life that seems most important for later melanoma risk.

Taking steps to lower exposure to natural and artificial sources of UV in youth and young adults could have huge health benefits.  Among a number of items, the AAP policy statement recommends that:

Pediatricians -
  • Incorporate advice about UV exposure in their practices
  • Use visits for sunburns as "teachable moments" about UV protection
  • Continue to encourage outdoor physical activity but in a sun-safe manner
  • Talk jointly with parents and children about sun-safe practices when kids get older and more independent, around ages 9 - 10
  • Advocate for safe-sun practices at school - earlier outdoor time, loosening of restrictions against hats, and shaded play areas
Governments -
  • Develop communication campaigns that raise awareness of the dangers of indoor tanning
  • Support broad use of successful safe-sun programs, such as the EPA's SunWise
  • Work toward laws/policies that ban minors' use of indoor tanning
Wholesale changes in sun exposure policies and behaviors aren't required to see positive results.  Like most public health efforts, small changes can lead to significant health benefits and, even more importantly, can get the ball rolling toward bigger changes in policies and behaviors.

Coming out of a long winter, it's that time of year when the sun is at its most inviting.  It also makes it a great time to lay the foundation for the sun-protection practices that we, and our kids, will carry throughout the summer and, hopefully, the rest of life.

Related CNiC Posts

Mother/Daughter Tanning and the Dual Nature of Family History


References Cited

Mother/Daughter Tanning and the Dual Nature of Family History

We've dedicated a number of posts over the past year on the policy and health pitfalls of indoor tanning - from the potential benefits of the "tanning tax" (post) to surprisingly high rates of tanning by some youth (post).  Now comes a fascinating, if not perfectly surprising, little analysis on the influence parents can have as indoor tanning enablers.

The small study - reported in the New York Times (story) and printed as a research letter in the Archives of Dermatology (letter - subscription required for full text) - included just over 200 female college students who had at any time in their lives tanned indoors.  Results showed that 40 percent of these students had had their very first tanning experience with their mothers, and that this mother/daughter group of students started tanning at earlier ages and were much more likely to be heavy tanners in college than those who'd first tanned with friends or gone on their own.

For an activity that has well demonstrated health risks, it's surprising that such a high percentage of students were actively introduced to tanning by a parent.  Using an extreme example, it's hard to imagine such a high percentage being introduced to smoking in the same way.

But perhaps the most interesting aspect of the study is how well it demonstrates the dual way that family history may influence future risk of disease.  Genes can certainly play a role but so to can the lifestyle choices that also permeate families - whether it's the food served in the kitchen or the activities done for leisure.  And with over half of all cancer and up to 75 percent of heart disease and diabetes preventable with things we can all do, it's important to realize that the choices made by families could have just as much, if not more, influence on health than the genes they carry.

Video: No Such Thing as Safe Tanning

In the June issue of the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, University of Minnesota researcher DeAnn Lazovich and colleagues published a study further confirming the dangers of indoor tanning, finding significant increases in the risk of melanoma linked to regular tanning bed use (link).  She summarizes her findings and take-home messages in this nice little video:


More Blistering Truths About Tanning Bed Use By Youth

A new study published online last week in the British Medical Journal on tanning bed use by youth in the United Kingdom has raised concerns well beyond its shores (full study) (1).  

The study surveyed over 9,000 children aged 11 -17 in England, Wales, and Scotland and found that 6 percent of those surveyed had used a tanning bed at one time, and another 15 percent of those surveyed had not used a tanning bed but felt they might do so in the future.  

Rates of use varied significantly by location, gender, age, and socioeconomic status.  Kids in the north tended to be more frequent users than those in the south.  Girls were more frequent users than boys.  Older kids more frequent users than younger kids; and those from lower socioeconomic groups more frequent user than those from higher groups.  Most notable were the extremely high rates in 15 - 17 year old girls in the cities of Liverpool and Sunderland , where rates reached upwards of 50 percent, the most striking evidence of a culture of tanning developing in the youth of the UK.

Exposure to UV radiation, particularly in youth and young adulthood, is a main cause of malignant melanoma - a particularly deadly form of skin cancer. And even though sunshine remains the most common source of UV exposure, tanning beds produce intense bouts of UV radiation and have been shown to independently raise melanoma risk (2).  With rates of malignant melanoma showing disturbing increases worldwide over the past decade, the results of the UK study are cause for alarm. 

One silver lining in the survey:  the youth who had not tanned said that health was a major reason for avoiding tanning beds.  Yet, this message is not having an impact on the behavior of all youth.  And with so much of the tanning bed use in the UK taking place in private homes or settings with inadequate supervision, youth are largely left on their own to make important decisions that can impact their long term health.

Moves toward mandatory restrictions on tanning bed use by minors under the age of 18 are gaining momentum in many countries, particularly Australia, which has been at the leading edge of sun and UV protection health campaigns.  Compelling policy papers have projected significant cost and health benefits and little downside to such restricted use in youth (3, 4).  

In the United States, rates of both developing and dying from melanoma are on the rise (5).  Partly in response to such troubling trends, the FDA has recently held hearings to consider tougher restrictions on tanning bed use.  The American Academy of Dermatology Association (AADA) - a public policy entity of the American Academy of Dermatology - goes so far as to support a total ban on tanning beds except for medical use.  Outside of an outright ban, the AADA recommends:
  1. Prohibiting access to indoor tanning for minors (under 18 years old)
  2. Educating all indoor tanning customers about the skin cancer risks and requiring their informed consent
  3. Implementing and enforcing labeling recommendations outlined in the Tanning Accountability and Notification (TAN) Act
  4. Encouraging enforcement of state regulations

The tanning bed industry is largely opposed to such regulation, and given the competing public and private interests, it's hard to know where the FDA will fall with tanning bed policy.  Voices in favor of greater regulation, though, are growing much much louder, and it's clear that steps that lower tanning bed use, particularly in minors, will go a long way toward lowering melanoma rates and improving the health of future generations.

Literature cited
  1. Thomson, C.S., et al., Sunbed use in children aged 11-17 in England: face to face quota sampling surveys in the National Prevalence Study and Six Cities Study. BMJ, 2010. 340: p. c877.
  2. World Health Organization (2003) Artificial tanning sunbeds: risk and guidance.  
  3. Hirst, N., et al., Estimation of avoidable skin cancers and cost-savings to government associated with regulation of the solarium industry in Australia. Health Policy, 2009. 89(3): p. 303-11.
  4. Gordon, L.G., et al., What impact would effective solarium regulation have in Australia? Med J Aust, 2008. 189(7): p. 375-8.
  5. Edwards, B.K., et al., Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 116(3): p. 544-73. (http://bit.ly/ccF9ma)